Prepare the child for the road, not the road for the child.
— Jonathan Haidt
In this week's discussion at The Forum, Joel tackled the provocative topic of safetyism—the cultural trend prioritising emotional comfort over growth and resilience. He broke down safetyism into four core ideas:
Belief that emotional discomfort is harmful.
Prioritising emotional safety over truth and freedom.
Overreacting to perceived threats.
A mindset that weakens individual resilience.
Joel highlighted real-life examples, such as the extreme COVID Anxiety Syndrome case, to illustrate how safetyism can isolate and immobilise people. He contrasted today's protective culture with the resilience shown during historical challenges, such as World War II’s "keep calm and carry on" spirit.
Key discussions:
Is protecting people from discomfort compassionate or controlling?
Are we teaching people how to think or merely how to feel?
How does a comfort-first approach lead to mental fragility?
Why independent thinking is essential for individual and societal health.
Attendees were challenged to reflect on the trade-offs between emotional safety and personal growth, the impact of comfort on critical thinking, and the vital role of independent thought in fostering resilience.
Share this post